D.W. Simpson Worldwide Actuarial Recruitment Life Health Pension Casualty US Asia Australia Europe Salary Apply Ezra Penland Actuarial Recruiters Top Actuary Jobs Salary Surveys Apply Bios Casualty Health Life Pension ACTEX Publications / MadRiver Books The Experts in Actuarial Education Serving students worldwide for over 40 years S.C. Inernational, Ltd. Recruiting Actuaries and Risk Prof. Since 1986 Actuarial Jobs     Surveys     For Employers Pauline Reimer, ASA, MAAA Pryor AssociatesActuarial Openings: Life, P&C, Health, Pensions, Finance Actuarial Careers, Inc. ® Actuarial Jobs WorldwideSearch positions: Geographic Region, Specialization, Salary

1. ## Poisson Mixture problem

Nov 2000 #13
A claim count distribution can be expressed as a mixed Poisson distribution. The mean of the Poisson distribution is uniformly distributed over the interval [0,5].
Calculate the probability that there are 2 or more claims.

I know the way i solved this question is wrong. Can you help me identify why my logic is flawed

I let X represent the mixed poisson distribution

E(X) = E(E(X|lamba )) = E(lamba) = mean of uniform [0, 5] = 2.5

P(X>= 2) = 1- P(x =0) - P(x =1) = 1- e(-2.5) -2.5e(-2.5) = 0.71

The answer 0.61 and is solved by this method (number 137) http://math.illinoisstate.edu/actuary/examm/m-09-05.pdf

2. Originally Posted by liltich
Nov 2000 #13
A claim count distribution can be expressed as a mixed Poisson distribution. The mean of the Poisson distribution is uniformly distributed over the interval [0,5].
Calculate the probability that there are 2 or more claims.

I know the way i solved this question is wrong. Can you help me identify why my logic is flawed

I let X represent the mixed poisson distribution

E(X) = E(E(X|lamba )) = E(lamba) = mean of uniform [0, 5] = 2.5

P(X>= 2) = 1- P(x =0) - P(x =1) = 1- e(-2.5) -2.5e(-2.5) = 0.71

The answer 0.61 and is solved by this method (number 137) http://math.illinoisstate.edu/actuary/examm/m-09-05.pdf
You cannot simply find the mean of lambda by (5/2).

P(0)= 1/5 * integral from 0 to 5 (e^(-lambda)) d(lambda)
This is the right way. you should be able to read it even it is messy.

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•