Sponsored Ads
D.W. Simpson
Worldwide Actuarial Recruitment
Life Health Pension Casualty US Asia Australia Europe Salary Apply
Ezra Penland Actuarial Recruiters
Top Actuary Jobs
Salary Surveys Apply Bios Casualty Health Life Pension
Pauline Reimer, ASA, MAAA
Pryor Associates
Actuarial Openings: Life, P&C, Health, Pensions, Finance
Advertise Here
Contact us at actuary@actuary.com or 770-425-8576
Reach top actuarial professionals

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Financial Planner using expected life incorrectly

  1. #1
    Damehc
    Guest

    Financial Planner using expected life incorrectly

    I'm currently 63yo and a former pension actuary (ASA). During a meeting with my financial planner, we were discussing the pros/cons of starting Social Security benefits at my NRA (66) or wait until I'm 70.

    Based on my actuarial training, back in the day, the proper actuarial analysis compares the following:

    Age 66 immediate annuity vs. 4-year deferred Age 70 annuity x 1.32.

    The 1.32 factor, of course, reflects the increase in delaying the SS benefit.

    My planner's analysis looked like this:

    Based on whatever actuarial tables he was using, my life expectancy was 83, or something. Let's just use 83.

    Then, he calculated the PV(age 66 to 83 SS benefit) and compared it to the PV(deferred age 70 to 83 benefit x 1.32). I forget the terminology, but this is just a plain ol' PV calculation without the mortality.

    I believe he is wrong, but I'm having a difficult time articulating the problem. It has to do with the fact that his calculation does not take into account that I might not live to age 83, or I might live longer.

    Or, notwithstanding the fact that he is using actuarial tables, he is turning what should be a probabilistic model into a deterministic model.

    Your thoughts? I'm still scratching my bald head over this.

    Thanks for reading.

  2. #2
    Actuary.com - Level II Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    44
    Damehc,

    Why does the planner deem the life expectancy relevant? Valuation of ordinary annuities only involves probabilities of survival and the interest rate(s).

    Does SS regulatory framework stipulate the use of life expectancy in some calculations? He would need to explain that.

  3. #3
    Damehc
    Guest
    Inaki,

    The financial planner is trying to answer the question - what is best for me, starting SS at age 66, or waiting until I'm 70 and collect a larger benefit. Since, I'm sure, he has had no training in ordinary annuities, his methodology is his way of accounting for the fact that I'll die someday.

    MY...question is how to articulate to him that his method is incorrect.

    Thanks for commenting.

  4. #4
    Actuary.com - Level II Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    44
    Explain it by going back to the basics:
    An annuity is the Present Value of a series of cash flows (contingent on survival, in a retirement context). Insofar as a Present Value, it depends on survival/probabilities, not on the expected age-at-death.

    If a financial planner doesn't understand it in those terms, I would question how he got hired to provide financial advice.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 9th 2014, 10:31 AM
  2. What a life financial actuary does - in his own words
    By Denny Crane in forum Actuarial Employment, Jobs, Careers, Interviewing, Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 18th 2009, 07:39 PM
  3. financial products for pension/life/non-life offices
    By Jeriot in forum Actuarial - General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 18th 2007, 01:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •