D.W. Simpson Worldwide Actuarial Recruitment Life Health Pension Casualty US Asia Australia Europe Salary Apply Ezra Penland Actuarial Recruiters Top Actuary Jobs Salary Surveys Apply Bios Casualty Health Life Pension Pauline Reimer, ASA, MAAA Pryor AssociatesActuarial Openings: Life, P&C, Health, Pensions, Finance Advertise Here Contact us at actuary@actuary.com or 770-425-8576Reach top actuarial professionals

1. ## Question about May 1992, Problem 12

Hey all. I'm having a bit of a problem. In Dr. Ostazewski's manual, it's number 13 in practice exam 5. I'm confused about the area of integration. Since y >= x, I thought the area should have been x: (0 to w), y: (x to 1), and for the second part x: (w to sqrt w), y: (x to w/x)? In simpler terms, I thought the shaded region should be to the upper left of the line y = x instead of to the lower right. I don't get it. I would be more than grateful if someone could help me out. Thanks very much all.

2. ## Question about May 1992, Problem 12

Dear Robertr24:

I do not know which edition of my manual you have: first or second edition, but
I think this is probably a typo that I have corrected in one of these posted errata:

First edition:
http://www.math.ilstu.edu/krzysio/P-Manual-Errata.pdf

Second edition:
http://www.math.ilstu.edu/krzysio/P-...dEd-Errata.pdf

I hope this helps. If it does not, please reply, or send me an e-mail.

Yours most sincerely,
Krzys' Ostaszewski

Originally Posted by robertr24
Hey all. I'm having a bit of a problem. In Dr. Ostazewski's manual, it's number 13 in practice exam 5. I'm confused about the area of integration. Since y >= x, I thought the area should have been x: (0 to w), y: (x to 1), and for the second part x: (w to sqrt w), y: (x to w/x)? In simpler terms, I thought the shaded region should be to the upper left of the line y = x instead of to the lower right. I don't get it. I would be more than grateful if someone could help me out. Thanks very much all.

3. Thanks. That clears things up a bit. However, I'm still confused about the actual integration. In the manual you have x:={0 to sqrt w}, y:={0 to x} for the first part, x:={sqrt w to 1}, y:={0 to x/w} for the second part. Doesn't this correspond to the area below the line y = x?

4. ## November 1992, Problem No. 12

The intersection of the line y = x and the hyperbola xy = w is at the point
( w^0.5, w^.05). First part is the integral over the shaded region between
the origin and the line y = w^.05, the second one is above that line
and still under the hyperbola. I still had typos in this solution, so I updated
http://www.math.ilstu.edu/krzysio/P-...dEd-Errata.pdf
http://www.math.ilstu.edu/krzysio/P-Manual-Errata.pdf

Yours,
Krzys'

In the first part, we have

Originally Posted by robertr24
Thanks. That clears things up a bit. However, I'm still confused about the actual integration. In the manual you have x:={0 to sqrt w}, y:={0 to x} for the first part, x:={sqrt w to 1}, y:={0 to x/w} for the second part. Doesn't this correspond to the area below the line y = x?

5. Thanks very much. I knew something was wrong there. It makes much more sense with the dx's and dy's interchanged. Sorry to drive you crazy. I will definitely look through ALL the errata before I post questions from now on.

6. ## Drive crazy? Not at all.

Dear Robert24:

Unfortunately, errors and typos still show up in my manuals, despite my best efforts.
So, I view your inquiry as a very nice gesture, helping me correct those errors. I appreciate it very much.

Yours very truly,
Krzys' Ostaszewski

Originally Posted by robertr24
Thanks very much. I knew something was wrong there. It makes much more sense with the dx's and dy's interchanged. Sorry to drive you crazy. I will definitely look through ALL the errata before I post questions from now on.

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•